UK plans to ban under-16s from using Instagram and TikTok: the biggest turning point of the social media era is here
Do you support this social media ban?
Key points
- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced that the government is considering new legislation to ban children and teens under 16 from using major social media platforms including Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat, and X.
- The policy is seen as an expanded version of Australia’s social media ban, extending oversight beyond users to platforms and their algorithms.
- As the next generation is increasingly restricted from using Instagram and TikTok, brands and the tech industry are beginning to ask: Where will young people spend their lives online in the future?
If Instagram and TikTok one day stop being part of teenagers’ everyday lives, what do you imagine the online world of the future will look like?
After Australia became the first country to implement a social media age ban, the UK government recently announced that it is considering similar legislation to prohibit children and teens under 16 from using major social media platforms. This isn’t just a policy debate about protecting children and teens; many see it as one of the most important turning points in social media’s 20-year history. This time, it isn’t only users being asked to change, but the entire platform ecosystem.
- Related reading: When design stops chasing the future: Copenhagen’s 3daysofdesign chooses a gentle return to the “present”!
UK moves forward with a “social media ban for children and teens”
Images from / gretty
On June 15, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would introduce new legislation to ban children and teens under 16 from using major social media platforms including TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, Snapchat, and X. The policy has been described as an “expanded version of Australia’s ban.” Beyond restricting minors from holding accounts, the UK government hopes to extend regulation to platform algorithms and content-recommendation systems, attempting to reduce the risks posed by social media at their source. The focus of scrutiny will no longer be limited to how teenagers use social media, but will also include how tech companies design their platforms and how algorithms affect users’ attention and mental health.
Australia has already implemented the world’s first social media ban
Images from / gretty
Australia got there before the UK. In 2025, Australia formally implemented the world’s first social media age ban, prohibiting children and teens under 16 from holding accounts on platforms such as Instagram and TikTok, making it the first country to put such rules into law. With the UK now preparing to follow suit, the conversation around teenagers and social media is gradually moving from a debate of principles toward concrete policy. For governments, social media is no longer simply an entertainment tool; it is an important environment shaping how an entire generation grows up.
Why are governments beginning to target social media platforms?
Images from / gretty
Over the past decade or so, social media has become one of the most important spaces in young people’s lives. Along with it have come cyberbullying, appearance anxiety, algorithm-driven addiction, scam risks, and mental health problems. Many studies suggest that prolonged exposure to algorithmically recommended content can worsen teenagers’ anxiety and pressure surrounding self-identity. Australia’s government therefore believes social media is no longer simply a social tool, but a public space that needs to be regulated. The UK government goes further: rather than only limiting minors’ access to platforms, it also hopes to address platform design and algorithms to reduce the likelihood that harmful content continues to be recommended.
Support and opposition emerge at the same time
Images from / gretty
The policy has, of course, sparked considerable debate. Supporters argue that social media has intensified teenagers’ anxiety, addiction, and mental health problems, and that appropriate restrictions can help protect the environment in which children and teens grow up. Opponents point out that after Australia introduced its ban, some teenagers still bypassed the restrictions through VPNs or their parents’ accounts, so the ban may not truly solve the problem. Others believe the issue that needs examination isn’t age limits, but the algorithms and business models behind the platforms. At the heart of the debate, the question is shifting from “Should children use social media?” to “How much responsibility should tech platforms bear?”
Where will online life take place in the future?
Images from / gretty
More than the ban itself, its long-term impact may be what deserves attention. As the next generation is increasingly restricted from using mainstream platforms such as Instagram and TikTok, brands, creators, and the tech industry have no choice but to consider: Where will the next generation of users gather? In the future, people’s attention may no longer be concentrated on traditional social media, shifting instead to entirely new digital spaces.
Beyond this article, here are a few recent reports worth checking out:
- The bigger, the more eye-catching? Beata Rydbacken’s “giant aesthetic” is perfectly in tune with the social media age
- A turning point for love and money: Venus enters Virgo, and each zodiac sign gets its own lucky color for the second half of the year
- So cute you’ll hardly want to use them: LUSH × Moomin turns the whole of Moominvalley into soothing scents
